William Scott 1913-1989
Seated Figure, 1954
oil on canvas
60 x 29 7/8 inches
152.3 x 75.8 cm
152.3 x 75.8 cm
signed
William Scott painted the present work around the same time as Seated Figure No.1. Aside from the figure’s ‘legs’, which in this version have been further simplified, the two paintings...
William Scott painted the present work around the same time as Seated Figure No.1. Aside from the figure’s ‘legs’, which in this version have been further simplified, the two paintings are virtually identical in both size and composition. It was not unusual for Scott to make another rendition of a work he was particularly pleased with, so that he could show the work more widely. The first version of the painting was exhibited three times in New York between 1954 and 1956, before it was sold to New York-based collector Guy A. Weill in 1957; meanwhile, this version featured in the 3rd International Art Exhibition that toured Japan in 1955. Seated Figure typifies Scott’s distinct painterly language in the period from 1951 to 1954, when he turned his attention from painting still lifes, landscape and figures to making ambiguous abstract works with rich, textural surfaces. Here, the painting’s image invites two readings – an abstract composition, and a seated figure with distorted, stick-like limbs, as alluded to by the work’s title. John Russell observed, ‘Nothing about it says: ‘’This is a human body.’’ Yet it spells out, irresistibly, the idea of a human body, and before long we cannot see it as anything else.’ 1
An invitation from the Arts Council to exhibit at the Festival of Britain in 1951 gave impetus to this change in direction in Scott’s work. As he explained, ‘I found that the forms I had been using would not easily expand, and I realised that another step towards simplification had to be made. This I did, not only in shape but in reducing my colour key. From then on, for three years, I made a series of paintings that contained practically no colour and a further reduction of multiple shapes. Pictures became more linear.’ 2 This trend towards abstraction united Scott with artists such as Roger Hilton, Victor Pasmore and Adrian Heath, and indeed the present work is remarkably comparable to a painting Hilton made the same year entitled Black on White, that Patrick Heron once described as ‘a Mondrian that is melting.’ 3
Upon inspection of the canvas surface, it appears that Scott created the present painting by first laying down an ochre and orange ground. When this had dried, he would have crudely delineated the figure in black paint, before applying white paint thickly, with loose, broad strokes, up to the edges of the black lines. Around these lines, hints of the coloured ground are still visible, imbuing what is otherwise a monochromatic painting with a subtle warmth. The expressive, unrefined manner in which Scott has executed this formal linear design emphasises the tactile, object-like quality of the painting.
1 Sarah Whitfield, William Scott Catalogue Raisonné of Oil Paintings 1952 – 1959, Volume 2, Thames & Hudson, London, 2013, p100
2 Alan Bowness, William Scott: Paintings, Drawings and Gouaches, 1938 – 71, Tate Gallery, 1972, exh cat, pp69 – 70
3 S. Whitfield, 2013, Ibid, p100
An invitation from the Arts Council to exhibit at the Festival of Britain in 1951 gave impetus to this change in direction in Scott’s work. As he explained, ‘I found that the forms I had been using would not easily expand, and I realised that another step towards simplification had to be made. This I did, not only in shape but in reducing my colour key. From then on, for three years, I made a series of paintings that contained practically no colour and a further reduction of multiple shapes. Pictures became more linear.’ 2 This trend towards abstraction united Scott with artists such as Roger Hilton, Victor Pasmore and Adrian Heath, and indeed the present work is remarkably comparable to a painting Hilton made the same year entitled Black on White, that Patrick Heron once described as ‘a Mondrian that is melting.’ 3
Upon inspection of the canvas surface, it appears that Scott created the present painting by first laying down an ochre and orange ground. When this had dried, he would have crudely delineated the figure in black paint, before applying white paint thickly, with loose, broad strokes, up to the edges of the black lines. Around these lines, hints of the coloured ground are still visible, imbuing what is otherwise a monochromatic painting with a subtle warmth. The expressive, unrefined manner in which Scott has executed this formal linear design emphasises the tactile, object-like quality of the painting.
1 Sarah Whitfield, William Scott Catalogue Raisonné of Oil Paintings 1952 – 1959, Volume 2, Thames & Hudson, London, 2013, p100
2 Alan Bowness, William Scott: Paintings, Drawings and Gouaches, 1938 – 71, Tate Gallery, 1972, exh cat, pp69 – 70
3 S. Whitfield, 2013, Ibid, p100
Provenance
Mary Scott (the artist’s wife)Private Collection, UK
Exhibitions
Tokyo, Metropolitan Art Gallery, 3rd International Art Exhibition, 20 May – 5 June 1955, cat no.142, illus b/w, as Figure, touring to:Osaka, Sogo Gallery, 24 June – 6 July 1955
Nagoya Culture Hall, 13 July – 26 July 1955
Fukuoka, Iwataya Gallery, 16 August –24 August 1955
Saseho, Public Hall Gallery, 8 September – 25 September 1955
Ube, Watamabe Memorial Hall, 1 October – 15 October 1955
Takamatsu, Modern Art Museum, 23 October – 13 November 1955
Hiroshima, The Fukuya Tenmaya,22 November – 4 December 1955
Hanover, Kestner-Gesellschaft, William Scott, 2 June – 17 July 1960, cat no.16, touring to:
Freiburg, Kunstverein, dates untraced
Dortmund, Museum Ostwall, 11 September – 2 October 1960
Munich, Städtische Galerie im Lenbachhaus, 12 January – 5 February 1961
Bern, Kunsthalle, Victor Pasmore & William Scott, 12 July – 18 August 1963, exh cat
Belfast, Ulster Museum, William Scott, 12 September – 5 October 1963, cat no.5
London, Tate Gallery, William Scott: Paintings, Drawings and Gouaches 1938 – 1971, 19 April –29 May 1972, cat no.38, illus b/w, as Seated Figure No.1, 1953, (incorrectly identified as being in the book by Alan Bowness 1964, no.48)
Enniskillen, Fermanagh County Museum, William Scott: Still Life Paintings 1946 – 1978, 19 May – 14 July 1979, cat no.9, touring to:
Londonderry and Belfast, closed 29 September 1979 (dated 1953, incorrectly identified as having been exhibited at the Martha Jackson Gallery in 1954 and 1956)
Dublin, Irish Museum of Modern Art, William Scott: Paintings and Drawings, 22 July – 1 November 1998, cat no.23, illus colour (dated 1953)
Wolfsburg, Kunstmuseum, Blast to Freeze: British Art in the 20th Century, 14 September 2002 – 19 January 2003, one of three works listed on p325, touring to:
Toulouse, Les Abattoirs, 24 February – 11 May 2003
New York, McCaffrey Fine Art, William Scott, 27 February – 17 April 2010, (dated 1953)
St Ives, Tate Gallery, William Scott, 26 January – 6 May 2013, touring to:
Wakefield, The Hepworth, 25 May –29 September 2013
Belfast, Ulster Museum, 25 October 2013 –2 February 2014
Literature
British Council Lecture, 1972, slide 39Margaret Garlake, New Art, New World, British Art in Postwar Society, Yale University Press, New Haven/London, 1988, pp203 – 204, illus b/w, as Seated Figure No.1, 1953
Michael Tooby and Simon Morley, William Scott: Paintings and Drawings, Merrell Holberton, London in association with the Irish Museum of Modern Art, Dublin, 1998, pp26 &57, illus colour
Norbert Lynton, William Scott, Thames &Hudson, London, 2004, pp128 – 130, illus colour as Seated Figure No.2.
Sarah Whitfield, William Scott Catalogue Raisonné of Oil Paintings 1952 – 1959, Volume 2, 2013, Thames & Hudson, London, in association with the William Scott Foundation, cat no.249, p102, illus colour p103